Archive for January, 2010

All Paths Lead to God

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Some people may come to this conclusion that there is a commonality and similarity that unites all religious thought and practice under one category as God. Yet this surface level view is Titanic as navigating the waters of religious diversity with an overconfidence that only sees the tip of the iceberg as neglecting to seriously consider the massive and deceptive destruction that lies just below the surface in boarding this doomed and sinking ship as a passenger that will never arrive at a safe harbor but will, to their surprise, drown under a false sense of security in thinking it to be indestructible.

Many people fail to recognize that most of these religious world views are so antithetical and divergent that they are plainly irreconcilable. This enlightenment comes when a person studies comparative religions/cults and like a sonar they pick up the significant differences as seeing its true shape and form as outlining its danger apart from a limited view and scope.

A Hindu can say that this is not a problem as contradiction is compatible with their philosophy yet they don’t walk the talk as their everyday lives reflects logic and reason even as it applies to the ideology of religion in that radical nationalistic Hindus are hostile towards other religious movements and the eastern gurus are often eager to convert Westerners to their way of thinking.

Practically speaking this whole idea perhaps evolved as a way to problem solve the tension between their competitive polytheistic past with an attempt to bridge the gap between these paths so as to broaden the road of life nonetheless this herd mentality will lead them to fall off the cliff as following the leader of religious pluralism.

Anyway some have attempted to use the analogy of the blind men and the elephant as relating this idea about god and though there is a god concept which is common among humanity as being intuitively hard-wired into the main frame of our being this does not always lead to a truthful correlation of reality.

Just because the blind person claims they can see in describing god does not mean that they couldn’t be lying or possibly deceived. This kind of subjectivism can be misleading as the motivating factor for ones perception can be imperfect for various reasons of self interests thus following the path of a religious teacher, guru, sage, and yogi can be presumptuous. Whose to say they are really touching god at all as it may be no more than the creative and imaginative process of inventing a god after their own likeness and image to correspond to their idolatrous desires. Jesus warns that there will be false prophets or blind gurus, who as the blind who lead the blind, they will both be led astray and off course.

Here is what the bible has to say on this matter

Mathew 24:24

24 For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.

Romans 1:18-23

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.

In conclusion to state that all views of god are equally valid and no one absolute view is essentially right becomes self refuting as applying to their very statement about all views being equally valid. Moreover to say that every expression is just a small part of the larger whole is conflicting as Hindus value their own uniqueness and exclusiveness as being essentially important otherwise they would see no problem or conflict as joining other groups or for that matter another unrelated religion in their experience of god. Furthermore to say that we all have just a little truth, then what reassures them that they have enough information to be effectual as being ultimately or essentially true.

Lastly it is one thing to accommodate various beliefs or belief systems but quite another to say that every belief can be proven to be equally valid or true. Thus religious tolerance is one matter while religious synthesis, relativism, inclusivism, and universalism is quite another. Forbearance is good but it does not supplant the need for a standard of truth and to say that there are “many ways” or valid paths to God will intolerably disqualify those who say there is only “one way.” Thus tolerance doesn’t become the measure of all things but rather truth spoken in tolerance and love is.

Finally, biblically speaking there are two paths that oppose one another. One is broad (many) that leads to destruction and the other is narrow (one) that leads to life. Just as most of us were given feet to walk we are also given a choice as to what path to travel. My challenge to you is will you take the broad way which merges all paths or will you dare to walk and explore the narrow way which leads to life? Jesus said I am the way, the truth, and the life and that none one comes to God except through Him.

Lastly God doesn’t just leave you blindly groping for the truth but rather he will open your eyes with a special revelation of who He is when you wholehearted and sincerely seek after him.

Mt 11:28-30

28 Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

 

How to know God

 

 

 

The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved. ESV Text Edition: 2007

Catholic Resources

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

1. CARM Ministries

carm.org/roman-catholicism

2. Ankerberg Theological Research Institution

Articles

3. Testimonies of former catholic priests

carm.org/testimonies-ex-roman-catholic-priests

god(s) of hinduism?

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

Within the religion of Hinduism a person can have a ranged view of a god concept where beliefs can vary anywhere between there being no god to one god and then to many gods, 330 million. Among these diverse ideas of god(s) there exists various dimensions to the nature of these supposed divine being(s) which includes monism, pantheism, panentheism, and animism.

When analyzing these beliefs regarding the manifestations of god(s) there is a discernible and apparent contradiction which defies logic as being irreconcilable on these matters. Therefore to accept such divergent views as being cohesive or congenial within Hindu society in thinking that sects “A” and “non A” are equally factual or accurate as expressing god becomes an unlivable and unsustainable ideology based not only on religious ideas but how one may conduct their day to day secular life with a constant need for reality as centered on the law of reason.

Also the god(s) of Hinduism are placed in the mythological backdrop of tribal beliefs versus a historical context and for this reason Hinduism’s god concept cannot be substantiated or confirmed as valid entities in that their existence is based on the storyline of the legends of make believe and superstition.This view is substantiated when comparing Hinduism to the mythology of other ancient religions as with the Egyptian, Greek, Roman, and Germanic or Slavic civilizations of which hardly no one takes seriously today as being no more than the stuff of religious fables or folklore.

God myths are emotionally powerful in enticing others with a sense of duty as based on mystery combined with awe as connecting people to some ultimate or transcendent reality which is contained within a cultural milieu of tradition. Its effects upon an individual, family, clan and society  at large are authoritatively influential even though they may be proven to be unreliable, fictional, or fallacious over the development of time. Why these beliefs tend to survive or exist today is based on many factors which are so persuasively integrated into every aspect of society that it becomes nearly impossible to dissuade others to believe otherwise as succumbing to a herd mentality of thinking by which their personal identity is so wrapped up or involved in a cultural heritage as becoming an essential matter towards personal security. We find common examples of this in sports teams and political parties as people are more than likely going to be loyally devoted and faithful to their team or party no matter what. This also became blatantly obvious based on the atrocities of Nazism of how whole cultures and societies can be deceived in their worldview. Therefore it is philosophically possible for everyone to be wrong but not every one can be absolutely right.

Again it becomes unthinkable for most people to contemplate that their god concept which they espouse and value may be a fallacy therefore avoiding any conclusion to the contrary especially if it is confirmed by others whom they esteem and respect. Yet my concern for my Hindu friends is to not allow the cultural boundaries,societal norms, and popularity be the measure of all things but rather let it be truth even if it takes you on a different passage in life then what you have followed; and even if it means to traverse this walk alone, let it not discourage you from pursuing it no matter where it may lead or take you. Otherwise you may end up going the wrong direction towards destruction as ensuing the well traveled or trodden path of misguided multitudes.

Matthew 7:13-14

13 “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. 14 For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.

Finally I hope that I have not upset you over the frankness or directness of this post. I know that  many uphold these beliefs out of a sense of sacredness and devotion, yet you can be passionate and sincere but sincerely wrong and that is the point  in which I lovingly challenge my Hindu friends.

In closing I don’t want to leave you skeptical about God but rather I would like to offer you an invitation to rest in the “One” who can shoulder your spiritual burdens. God bless!

Jesus said according to Mt 11:28-30

28 Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”

 

 

How to know God
Hindu Resources
English Articles on Hinduism

 

 

 

The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®) Copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. All rights reserved. ESV Text Edition: 2007

איך לקיים מערכת יחסים עם האלוהים

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

התנ”ך מלמד אותנו ש אלוהים יצר הכל כולל האנושות ועל אף אלוהים הוא מושלם וטוב,  האיש לא. אלוהים עשה האנושות סוכן מוסרי חופשי שנתן לו את היכולת לבחור בין טוב לרע. הספר הקדוש של אלוהים, התנ”ך, הוא גילוי של  עצמו אשר אומר לנו שאנו כולם חטאנו ונפלנו קצר של כבודו

אם הייתי נוקב כמה מהמצוות, אשר מהווה את הבסיס המוסרי של החוק, לא יהיה אף אחד שלא חטא  החוק של אלוהים במידה מסוימת. החטא הוא הפרה של  אלוהים ואנשים אחרים  אם זה יהיה דרך ההגשה אלהים אחרים או ניצול השם עם יישום מלא יותר של אי אוהב את אלוהים עם כל הלב שלנו. מצווה זו  בא אחרי חילל כבוד הורינו, רצח אשר הוא השווה  לשנאה, ניאוף אשר השוותה  להתחשקות עם העיניים שלנו, לגנוב, נושאת עדות שקר נגד השכן שלנו, ולחמוד את רכוש של אדם אחר או אשתו שמתסק עם רצונות ומניעים לא נכונים

פגיעה זו גרמה לנו להיות מנותקים או מנוכרים של אלוהים לנצח. במילים אחרות אנחנו אבודים ומופרדים ממנו  כי הוא לא ירשה לעצמו להיות קדוש כדי לשכב עם חטא. חטא מביא זעמו של אלוהים  והשיפוט שלו לא רק כאן אלא גם לנצח. התנ”ך מתאר אותו כמקום שבו האש לא מכובה והיו שם הוא סבל רב

בשלב זה הדברים נראים אבודים אבל החדשות הטובות הן כי אלוהים שלח את המשיח שהיה ללא חטא. תפקידו היה להשתדל עבור העם לפני אלוהים ואיך הוא עשה את זה היה על ידי מתן החיים  הפיזי שלו כסוג של חילופי בשמנו ולכן סיפוק הצדק של אלוהים

הוא לא רק מת למען האנושות שעשה שלום לנו עם אלוהים, אבל גם הוא קם מן המתים וכעת הוא ממתין לקבל את מי הניח את אמונם בו. אז עכשיו כאשר אנו עוברים מעל למוות גופנו ימותו אבל אנחנו ניהי נוכחים איתו וזה מה שהתנ”ך מתיחס לחיי נצח

כל זה מתרחש כאשר אנו עושים לב חש וידוי של האמונה בישוע כמושיענו לזהות אותו כמי מסיר חטא מביא לנו שלום עם אלוהים. זה כולל גם לקבל אותו כאלוהים במובן שאנחנו עכשיו משרתים אותו בציות

כאשר אנו מקבלים את ישוע בתפקידו זה אז הוא שולח לנו פיסת גן עדן בדמותו של רוח הקודש שעולה להתגורר במאמין שעוזרת לנו לחיות את חיינו אל אלוהים

עסקה זו של אמונה ואחריו לעבור את טקס הטבילה של מים או טבילה אשר להמשיל אל קבר מימי. פעולה זו מסמלת לידה חדשה על ידי פיזית המנציח את העבודה הפנימית של אלוהים אשר הכריז והודה דרך פעולה זו אשר מעביר המציאות הרוחנית של השינוי להפוך אדם חדש מבפנים

תהליך זה אולי נראה כמו כל העסקה פשוט אך הוא מלא חשיבות ומשמעות רבה. ישוע הוא מזמין אותך באומרו “בואו אלי כל העמלים והעמוסים ואני אמציא לכם מנוחה. קחו עליכם את עלי ולמדו ממני כי ענו אני ונמוך רוחי תמצאו מרגוע לנפשותיכם כי עלי נעים וקל משאי

חבר אם היום אתה שומע את קול שלו קורא לך שלו אז בבקשה לא להקשות את הלב שלך אלא להגיש את חייך אל הרועה של הנשמה שלך. הוא אוהב אותך והוא אתן לך שלום עולה כי כל ההבנה כי היא שמחה שלא תתואר. זה לא אומר שאתה לעולם לא בכל מזג אוויר סערות בחיים שלך אבל הוא אינו מבטיח לנו ש הוא לעולם לא יעזוב אותנו ולא תנטוש אותנו

לסיום הייתי ממליץ לך להתפלל אליו כדי לחשוף את עצמו לך דרך אמיתית ומוחשית כדי להאמין בו. אם תעשה זאת בכנות וביושר לב אתה לא תהיה מאוכזב כי  אנו מעודדים מטאפורי לטעום ולראות שהאדון הוא טוב. אמן

 

www.4laws.com/laws/hebrew/default.html

How to know God

Copyright Permission by “The Bible Society in Israel” P.O. Box 44 Jerusalem, 91000 Israel

Catholic Justification

Friday, January 15th, 2010

This is perhaps the biggest dilemma that in my opinion faces Catholicism. It presents itself as a conjoining of Jesus with a merit system in order to credit heaven while avoiding lengthy periods spent in a purgatorial realm. In other words according to this view eternal salvation is not achieved determinately by Christ but it requires our further assistance to complete the transaction successively in securing the wealth of an eternal bliss.

Concerning the motif of “works” I am aware that there are responsibilities and a cooperation of maintaining a relationship with God as a believer regarding the outworking of our faith. Yet according to biblical teaching this cooperation or response towards God is not an add on as if there is something insufficient or lacking in the perfect and complete atonement of Christ. It’s not as if He starts the work and now we have to finish it for Him. Rather works is a manifestation to the fruitful outcome of our relationship with Christ.

Anyway when viewing our relationship with God it is similar to other types of covenantal relationships such as a holy union between a husband and wife.

According to the analogy of marriage we can illustrate this natural relationship as compared to our devotion and commitment to God.

First it is God who initiates the process by drawing us into a loving relationship with him, John 6:44. This relationship is consummated and justified by joining oneself in covenant to Jesus through the sacrificial offering of Christ, Mark 14:24; Romans 5:9, which consequently results in us being spiritually regenerated and sanctified by the Holy Spirit Titus 3: 4-7 and 1 Corinthians 6:11 as we enter into this mystical union as the bride of Christ, Ephesians 5:22-33. This relationship will ultimately culminate in us receiving or being the heirs of eternal life having placed the seal of the Holy Spirit in us as a guarantee to this covenantal relationship, Ephesians 1:13 -14, 2 Corinthians 1:22, and Romans 8:9.

This living dynamic of a significant sign serves as a marked witness to the reality of being properly related to Him, Romans 8:16.

My question to you is are you properly related to Christ through the inner witness of the Holy Spirit or are you trying to secure your relationship through a dowry of impoverished works?

I discuss more about this in the blog that I posted on “Born Again” and “Catholic Tradition” at

jesusandjews.com/wordpress/2009/12/20/born-again/

jesusandjews.com/wordpress/2009/12/26/catholic-tradition/

When relating to the concept of the “works” of God, Jesus states that it is the nature of the tree that determines its fruitfulness or fruitlessness. In other words a good tree (nature) bears good fruit (works). The only way that we can authentically produce the works of righteousness is after we have received the fruit bearing nature of the Spirit through new birth. Galatians 5:22-23 and Romans 8:4.

One example of what I am saying is like relating this idea to that of a Christmas tree.

We may think that by adding ornaments (works) to a dead tree (unregenerate person) that it will bear the resemblance of beauty yet that does not make the tree alive unto God. This is an artificial beauty that at the end of the season causes us to put up the ornaments and discard the tree. So in reality there was no real value to the tree except for its temporal ceremonial purpose.

This idea also relates to the outward adornment of the righteous acts performed by the religious Jews in Jesus day who were spiritually dead unto God, Matthew 23.

Independent of Holy Spirit regeneration, “works” is an inadequate attempt to achieve righteousness, Romans 3:20.

The problem with combining faith with self works is that this is also the same expression of belief that is practiced among many religions and cults in which they share this mentality of earning and achieving as a means of gaining heaven while avoiding the pitfalls of hell.

To read more on these themes it would be good to study and meditate on the books of Romans, Galatians, and Hebrews to get a better understanding of these interrelated concepts.

To give a quick glance to the concept of a “works” related program and its shortcomings it would be best to take a preview of the transitory system of the Old Covenant law.

Biblical history indicates that the covenant community of the Israelites had the revelatory word of God as based in the Torah, Prophets, and the Writings for over a millennium before the advent of Christianity. This Old Testament law proved to be an imperfect system of which never achieved for them righteous because it was intended to be merely a foreshadow to the ultimate reality of Christ as the sacrifice given once and for all and therefore could not make oneself perfect in drawing them near to God Colossians 2:17; Hebrews 10:1-18.

The Israelite community could not live up to the standards of the law and even David who was a man after God’s own heart states that there is no one who does good and this is also reiterated by Solomon who was the wisest of all men who stated that there is not a righteous man on the earth that never sins, Psalms 14:1-3, Ecclesiastes 7:20, and Romans 3:10-12; 23. Even the prophet Isaiah states that our righteous acts are like filthy rags Isaiah 64:6.

The New Testament clearly portrays that the old covenant was imperfect due to the problem of fallen humanity, Romans 8:1-17. The law could not be upheld due to the weakness of human nature but by faith in Christ this would be overcome through the Spirit filled life. That’s why it’s good news and not the same old news because Jesus did for us what we couldn’t do for ourselves and that is to absolve sin and it consequences Romans 5:6; Galatians 4:4,5.

You know Paul had great credentials and under the old covenant law he was a very religious man who zealously claimed his legalistic righteousness as being faultless and yet he considered it rubbish compared to the riches of knowing Christ, Philippians 3:1-9; Galatians 1:14.

You might ask yourself at this point the same question that the disciples asked Jesus when he was explaining to them the stringent requirements of the law in which they remarked “Who then can be saved” and Jesus replied,”with man it is impossible but with God all things are possible” and therein lays the revelation to this picture of redemption. He is able to accomplish what we can not, Matthew 19:16-26.

The mystery of salvation would be fully realized through the saving blood of Christ under the new covenant as outlined in Jeremiah 31:31-34, Luke 22:20 which would restore our relationship with God resulting in the new birth with the advent of the Spirit age John 3:3-8, 1 Peter 1:3;23, and  Ezekiel 36:25-29.

God was doing away with the obsolete system of a works related relationship and just 40 years proceeding Jesus death the destruction of the temple occurred in 70AD as a way to emphatically say that this program is kaput and no more and even to this day it has never been rebuilt.

If we could obtain righteousness apart from Christ then why was the first covenant abolished and made obsolete, Hebrews 8:13? If Israel could have made itself righteous through observing the law then why did the nation end up in exile and the Diaspora?

The bottom line is that without Jesus and the Holy Spirit living in you there is no salvation and it is an impossibility no matter how diligent or observant a person is regarding the keeping of sacramental legislation.

In Romans 3:20 it states that no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law.

In 1 Corinthians 1:30 and Romans 3:21-22 it is Christ that is our righteousness.

Righteousness is a work of God and “work” related results are merely his handiwork on display in our lives Ephesians 2:10, John 15:5.

Works doesn’t earn salvation but rather it is the proof of it. Works is an expression or manifestation of our faith, not the substance of it.

Galatians 2:15-21 shows that a man is not justified by observing the law and if we could gain it then Christ died needlessly.

Paul wrote allot about this overachiever mentality of works because that was the order of the system that they had just transitioned from and it was still hardwired within the main frame of their being.

The Jews, particularly those to whom Paul referred to as Judaizers, where struggling with this whole concept of grace and justification by faith and Paul spent much of his time refuting this system of belief which resulted in the first council meeting at Jerusalem in Acts 15.

Lastly to ensure that there is no misunderstanding the scripture spells it out plainly in Ephesians 2:8-9 8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.

Finally the Pharisees were notorious for upholding the law in a meticulous fashion in that they would strain at a gnat over the details. They were so careful to keep the law that they built a hedge about the law by adding requirements that went beyond the scope of biblical orthodoxy. They were zealous for God as spoken of in Romans 10:1-4 and they weighed down people with the burdens of their laws in Matthew 23:4, Acts 15:10-11, and Mark 7:1-13.

In conclusion, you may sense that you have been weighed down with the burdens of religious activity and rituals which has left you with a sense of insecurity in your standing with God. So in closing I would like to encourage you to heed the words of Jesus in Matthew 11:28-30 28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

 

 


How to know God

Catholic Resources

Articles on Catholicism

Purgatory

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Purgatory is held as an ancient tradition but it is not substantiated according to the biblical record.

Actually the bible does not describe an intermediary state of judgment where people are further purified from their sins but instead it shows a permanent state of being after death within the context of an eternal abode or residence for both the righteous and the unrighteous.

Anyway concerning life beyond the grave the Old Testament provides a limited view of the afterlife and the concept of heaven and hell is more fully developed as a progressive revelation which is further defined according to the witness of the New Testament.

The concept of a purgatorial existence has its origins in the Apocryphal literature of the Maccabees which was not accepted as a sacred text by either the Jewish community which convened the council of Jamnia in 90 A.D. or the early church with the council of Carthage in 397A.D.

These councils were ordered to establish the divine inspiration of the scripture in contrast to the heretical teachings of pseudo religious literature.

This extra-Biblical book of the Maccabees was originally included in the Greek Septuagint and was later added to both the Orthodox and Catholic bibles but it was never considered canonical by those to whom these documents originated.

According to Paul in Romans 3:2 the Jews are the stewards of God’s words and they carried the responsibility to establish biblical authority under God’s directive in order to preserve God’s holy text and as a result this book along with the other Apocryphal literature of the intertestamental period was not included and was left at best as somewhat of a historical document.

The problem of extra biblical teaching is that it is primarily based on the traditional authority of a movement which can be misleading and with something as critical as life after death this teaching now becomes crucially important because of the eternality of ones soul.

In addition to this there has been the inclusion of rules that govern the effectiveness and degree of this supposed temporal state which again has no scriptural backing.

Also Catholicism teaches an intercessory role based on the various actions of the living and the meritorious deeds of the dead. This again has no biblical basis and it is presumptuous to say that the reciting of the mass and rosary, penance, and indulgences are a supplemental atonement to the work of Christ, Hebrews 7:25.

One example of the failure to this erroneous system was the abuse of indulgences in which people were paying their way to get a ticket to heaven by means of their monetary resources crediting to their spiritual account a monopolized attitude of getting out of jail which only served in reality towards the exploitation of others to benefit the coffers of religion.

The danger in this whole matter is the false assurance given to a system that can not be established scripturally which in turn has erroneously served as an enticing concept that falsely relieves an individual of their own moral responsibility before God in passing off their sins to others of which Christ alone has atoned for.

So in conclusion should we place our confidence in the authority of the word of God or the hierarchy of a religious body? I write more about Catholic tradition in another blog that I have recently posted at jesusandjews.com/wordpress/2009/12/26/catholic-tradition/

Lastly I would like to give a couple of cases from the bible which give an alternative view to Catholic tradition.

One example of someone who did not have to suffer for his venial or mortal sins is the criminal who was crucified alongside of Christ and was exonerated by Jesus at a decisive moment preceding his death in Luke 23:32-43.

Jesus told this thief that today you would be with me in Paradise and not only does this place him in proximity to Christ but it also indicates a desirous place rather than a torturous realm.

Purgatory was not mentioned here and the divine pardon was granted without further purgatorial treatment.

This example would be a clear indication of someone who according to Acts 2:21 simply called on the name of the Lord to be saved without the rigors of including the sacramental antidotes.

Also in 2 Corinthians 5:6-8 it states that as believers who experience death they will be immediately ushered into the presence of the Lord and there is no indication of another itinerant habitation.

Finally there is a judgment seat for believers as indicated in the scriptures but it is of a different nature than what is prescribed by the traditions of the Catholic clergy and it can best be understand by reading the scriptural tradition versus the tradition of men.

In conclusion I hope that you would seriously consider the inscripturated text in lieu of Catholic doctrine. I pray that you will seek the counsel of the scripture and the guidance of the Holy Spirit which will lead you into all truth.

Again I desire this post to serve the purpose of challenging your heart and I pray I have not offended you in anyway and even though I have spoken of things in a critical way yet hopefully it was without a critical attitude.

In many ways I respect the devotion and sincerity of my Catholic friends but you can be sincere and still be sincerely wrong and the purpose for these blogs is to establish truth which alone can set you free.

 

 

How to know God

Catholic Resources

Articles on Catholicism

 

 

 

Copyright permission from christian apologetics and research ministry “CARM”