Archive for June, 2010

Shintoism

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

When looking at the religion of Shintoism or Shen-tao/kami no michi which means the “the way of the gods”, “the way of the spirits”, “the way of the kami” it is easy for the contemporary mind to see the mythology of this religious worldview as portrayed in the writings of the Kojiki and Nihongi.

This religion has a polytheistic view which includes a pantheon of gods much like the greek society and yet holds to an animistic belief of eight million million kami which are said to be spirits or gods which inhabit and possess everything from  shrines to swords to everything in-between. This form of animism is a primitive belief system that many of the remote tribal societies have today which through their superstitions have kept them bound in fear.

When looking at these copious amounts of gods and kami’s I’m not for sure how they can accurately account for these numbers especially since the kami should be increasing or multiplying due to ancestral deaths.

Also this religion is not unique or pure as it has borrowed and incorporated syncretistic  elements from both Buddhism and Confucianism which ironically are atheistic in their philosophy. There are also many and varied sects which make up this religious system therefore making it difficult to keep track of or navigate the nuances of belief which has resulted in a lack of uniformity.

Another aspect of Shintoism, which is controversial, was its former practice of emperor worship which was renounced by Hirohito after the downfall of Japan in World War 2. He basically dethroned himself as being any kind of a Demi-god  after his defeat which ultimately proved him to be an impostor concerning his deification.

Is it possible that this wrongful association of divinity that was attributed to the imperial family could be equally applied to the the kami and gods as well who were also conquered as being the creators and protectors of the Japanese people?

Anyway Shintoism has failed to support its truth claims and more than likely the reason why it could no longer be considered a state sponsored religion is because Shintoism couldn’t adapt to explain its defeat to other inferior creatures or cultures therefore destroying the internal structure of its religious agenda. After all was the kami of the West more powerful or was it because the kami of Japan were angry at its devotees and unresponsive therefore not coming to their aid at a critical moment in its history. Maybe it was that these ideas were just man made myths concerning the gods and kami that had been created in the imaginative folklore of religious superstition? In actuality the latter seems to be more of a reasonable explanation which attempted to validate their existence which was ultimately rendered powerless and non-existent due to the kami’s inability to act.

The danger of these tales help depict how that the Japanese people were superior due to the creation of their island and as being direct descendants from the kami. I understand that Japan is a beautiful place and they are an industrious nation but to elevate themselves to being the elite offspring of the kami is egocentric. Its easy to see that there is a much bigger world out there which encompasses the realm of the creation.

I think it is typical for people groups to somehow elevate themselves above others in taking a sense of pride and independency as a special or unique creation.This competitiveness of human nature often takes this kind of prevalent and predominant view among cultures in identifying themselves as the super race.

Unfortunately Japan who had these types of religious ideologies formed an alliance under the tripartite pact with the likes of Mussolini and the evil genius Adolph Hitler who held to this same type of racial elitism. Ironically his philosophy of the Aryan race of white supremacists would be antithetical to its Asian counterpart.

Anyway Hitler’s attempt to proliferate his ideas and take dominion of Europe and perhaps the world resulted from his propaganda campaigns of hatred which brought about a false sense of superiority which ended in all forms of discrimination and prejudice which afflicted others who were under the observation of the Fuhrer’s spectacles as they were viewed as objects of an inferior race.

These atheistic cultures saw mankind as being no different that just another animal and therefore people are reduced to being bags of proteins. This kind of thinking is what has helped to justify some of the horrors that we have seen come out of these Godless societies which has created these mindless genocidal endeavors. After all to those who have taken this evil course of action towards outsiders saw them as no more than lower life forms that are not fit to be classified as human beings. These bigoted cultures fail to recognize the sanctity and value of human life and therefore the labor camps of the Holocaust were no more different to them than the bacterium that was at work in a sewage treatment plant. The final solution towards their actions came from under the influence of Darwinism which supports a view that justifies the survival of the fittest where might makes right.

Japan as apart of this antagonistic regime had taken a position of aggression on Southeast Asia and the Pacific which ultimately failed therefore removing its self acclaimed status of greatness.

This power struggle to establish itself as a world power seems inconsistent with their religious commitment which had portrayed their culture as ethical in being upright in heart, courteous, honest and who were acting as basically good people. Yet their actions speak louder than words as they positioned themselves for domination during World War 2.

4 Today we see evidence of this ethical facade as well due to the moral failures of Japanese culture whether it be the ruling class or the individualism of the rebellious teenager. In Japan there is a rise of anti-social and violent cults along with presence of materialism,drugs and sex slaves which makes it easy to notice that there is something wrong within the so called sacred grounds of Japanese society. Whether it is the cult of  Aum Shinrikyo and their attempts at mass murder or the leftist groups like the Japanese red army and the opposing 1000 or so right wing extremist groups these examples all show the breakdown of Japanese society.

By saying all of this I don’t mean this as an attack on the precious and dear people of Japan but rather these statements serve as a reflection in showing that their cultural  tendencies towards evil is no different than the rest of the world community regardless of their religious intentions. I personally  have enjoyed and loved the people of these asian cultures because of their general warmness but in the final analysis they are people who likewise suffer and struggle under the common human problem of sin which has invaded Japanese culture.

Shintoism has avoided such notions as sin because of its emphasis on the goodness of mankind and yet the evidence shows there’s a lack of support for this claim. Therefore it fails to identify and address the societal evils that is resident even among the land of the shrines. Ironically I do believe that Shintoism does identify at least to some degree a sense of depravity in their society as expressed by the negative prohibitions of the “do not’s” as found in the ten commandments or the ten precepts of Shinto belief.

In conclusion I think that the Japanese society has seen the duplicity of this movement which has left a spiritual void in which the Japanese have been trying to insatiably fill. Its no wonder that this emptiness of religious belief has left them disillusioned and searching for more relevant answers in their quest to find meaning for life. 4 Is it any wonder that every year that there are uprisings of about a 100 new religions?

When looking at this from a biblical perspective their is an association between the new testament text and what we see as a religious phenomena that is underway in Japan. As a part of ancient greek culture the Apostle Paul while visiting Athens saw a plethora of religiosity and gods which resulted in him taking the opportunity to address the Athenians and philosophers on Mars Hill in helping them to solve their religious identity. These Greeks much like the contemporary Japanese were searching for new suggestions or ideas to fit within the religious context of their society and it is within this context that Paul is able to give a defense towards finding a unifying truth behind their religious behavior.

Acts 17:22-31 22 Paul then stood up in the meeting of the Areopagus and said: “Men of Athens! I see that in every way you are very religious. 23 For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: to an unknown god. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you.

24 “The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. 25 And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, because he himself gives all men life and breath and everything else. 26 From one man he made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live. 27 God did this so that men would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28 ‘For in him we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’

29 “Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone—an image made by man’s design and skill. 30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. 31 For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to all men by raising him from the dead.”

This discourse that Paul made is a general summary to resolving the religious questions that these philosophers were wrestling with concerning the sozosha “Creator’’ or sozo no kami “creator God”.

Maybe you like them have wrestled over these very same kind of questions as related to existence and the meaning of your life. Perhaps Shintoism has failed to answer your purpose in life “ikigai” or the  relevant questions that resound within the depths of your soul and I hope that you would prayerfully consider and be open to some things which I would like to share with you from my personal testimony.

How to know God

jesusandjews.com/wordpress/my-personal-testimony-with-jesus/

Before God we have a sense of indebtedness because we are all polluted by sin and need to be washed and cleansed by being purified “harai” through spiritual regeneration which is accomplished as Jesus comes to commune with us by the Holy Spirit.

Jesus can bring about this fellowship in your life as you trust in Him to set you free from this law of sin and death which has separated you from God in giving you the gift of eternal life. This is a gift which can not be earned or merited by human achievement or action because a gift is free.

Finally the makoto or truth reality which goes beyond my propositional claim can be readily identified and attested to by my personal life testimony.

Literally when Jesus came into my life it was like taking a bath on the inside resulting  in a pure heart “kokoro” as now I can approach God.

You might be saying to yourself that you can never accept this premise because you  view Christianity as just a foreign religion and therefore resist anything that smacks of Westernized ideas but in reality Christianity had its origin in the East and unlike Shintoism it has proliferated itself beyond its geographical boundaries as a universal movement. Paradoxically, even though Shintoism has remained predominantly isolated as a movement it still sees a value to the world according to its fifth precept which recognizes a big family concept.

Jesus said in John 3:16,17 16 “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

Jesus is for all peoples and this is evidenced even in Japan where there are around 2 million Christians. So don’t allow the confines of culture to dictate your value as based on the religious ideologies  of Shintoism which as you can see has had many shortcomings. Anyway your society has already broke free of the traditional forms of religion just from its flurry of religious activity which has them searching in other arenas for the essentials of life and in turn I would ask you to seriously consider the content of this post and to believe upon Jesus who is the “Son” that is rising over Japan to bring light to every heart by illuminating their souls.

Mt. 11: 28-30: 28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

 

 

Shintoism Resources

Articles on Shintoism

 

 

 

1 The Holy Bible : New International Version. 1996 (electronic ed.) (Ac 17:22–31). Grand Rapids: Zondervan

2 The Holy Bible : New International Version. 1996 (electronic ed.) (Mt 11:28–30). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

AMG’s World Religions and Cults, AMG Publishers, Chattanooga, Tennessee

4 Extract taken from Operation World, Copyright© 2001 by Patrick Johnstone. Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

What’s the Big Deal about Other Religions, Copyright 2008 by John Ankerberg and Dillon Burroughs, Published by Harvest House Publishers, Eugene,OR 97402, www.harvesthousepublishers.com, Used by permission

Handbook of Today’s Religion, Copyright 1983 by Campus Crusade for Christ Inc., Published by Thomas Nelson Publishers

Hume, Robert E., The World’s Living Religions, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, rev. ed., 1959, pp. 172

Smart, Ninian, The Religious Experience of Mankind, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969, pp. 192,193.

The Evolution of Man

Monday, June 7th, 2010

When contemplating this theory I believe the inquirer must first of all ask themselves what is their motivation in seeking an answer for this question.

Do you have a vested interest in wanting just the facts or is their a bias or prejudice when peering backwards through the ages of time? Perhaps you might ask your self what am I really hoping to find at the end of my quest for truth.

If you honestly and sincerely make a fair approach to this solution then you will be shocked to find out that scientific inquiry has very little to do with the basis of this theory as this ideology has only a thin shell like veneer that has the appearance of substance but in reality only contains hollow assertions to the realm of science and in essence it is projected to be more like a sci-fi program.

What you may not understand is that these so called scientists have an agenda based on their presuppositions which have them searching for selective answers in employing  any type of scientific method towards the gathering and explanation of the data. Their goal can be summarized as supporting an atheistic worldview that is devoid of God and they are committed to manipulate and control the evidence to support their truth claims which makes it more of a philosophy and a religion than a bona fide science.

They can publish something in a journal or a textbook or put it on the television as being factual and they can embellish the content with the aid of professional artists who through imagination and creation can exhibit an impressive display of magical awe. The proponents of this philosophy  can present their case professionally through the credentials of parading Phd’s behinds the scenes of these archaeological discoveries and present themselves with elaborate commentary and impressive footage so convincing that it captivates the audience to have enough faith in their scientific community in which to believe. Yet this is no more than a propaganda scheme which has been preached from the pulpits of academia in order to gain converts.

You might be thinking that you are not qualified to differentiate between truth or fiction on these matters and yet we make all kinds of distinctions and personal decisions without the assistance of others? If anything lets hold these scientists accountable for their information as we do our politicians and other sectors of society. Perhaps you have thought well these are intelligent and educated people who are passionate about their beliefs and committed to their fields of studies and yet that can describe any group of people that is dedicated to a cause whether right or wrong and yet we forget to realize that there have been people that have been so easily deceived over the course of world history by the experts of their times.

Also sometimes we are gullible because it supports something that we want to believe or that we find attractive such as a naturalistic position versus a theistic world view. This is because we want to be alone in the universe as being our own god in charge of our own destiny without considering a hierarchal being that may threaten our state of existence.

This may be one of the reasons why we are so easily indoctrinated by these gurus of science.

Perhaps the determining factor really comes down in this debate as being a matter of a moral choice versus an intellectual endeavor when dealing with the aspects of how one weighs the evidence or should I say lack of evidence in question.

When you actually look at the scientific data and the hoaxes that have been presented in this field it should make the individual skeptical of anything they want to link as being evolutionary.

To begin with we have had more technological advances in this era of the scientific age and yet we have failed to produce all of the intermediary life forms that were said to of existed in order to account for life. This also applies to the anthropologists who have been negligent in providing sustainable evidence to support its theoretical claims that we have evolved from a molecule to a man. Evolutionists can’t even prove the evolution of man within the so called family of beings let alone trace our ancestry back to the primordial ooze of some single cell amoeba.

For instance the jawbone of Ramapithecus has been debated extensively among scientists who are not conclusive over this specimen.

Then there is the Piltdown man which turned out be a hoax in 1953 as they obtained filed teeth and bone that was stained in order to make it appear ancient.

The Nebraska man was fabricated by a single tooth that was found in 1922. A few years later they found the skull that matched the empty socket for the tooth only to find out that it had originated from a pig.

Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon man are believed by some evolutionists to be normal European “Homo sapiens”

Yet another example is the Peking man whose bones can no longer be located which is pretty remarkable for such an important find but suspiciously one of the men who helped to find Peking Man was one of the individuals that was also involved in the Piltdown man hoax.

Then there is Java Man who was found by Dr. Eugene Dubois who claimed him to be that of  homo erectus and yet at the end of his life he recanted his statement in which he differentiated the pieces by ascribing the leg bone to homo sapiens while the skullcap to be that of a giant ape or gibbon and therefore he discredited his own claim as being one of our ancient family members.

The Heidelberg man is a single fossil which consists of a lower jaw with teeth and the finding on these skeletal remains still remains elusive.

Another find is the composite skeleton of Lucy which had been assembled from various finds in the vicinity but not in the same immediate location and likewise it has not been conclusively identified either.

Actually there has not been enough pieces of so called fossilized man to fill a shallow grave. In the final summary these skeletal remains are either identified as primate or human not in between.

These evolutionists may have purported to have found a workable model to perpetrate a science of  philosophy which is really centered on disproving the ideology of intelligent design in lieu of their religion of Atheism.

Also when looking at the differences between primates and man there are 31 major differences that are irreconcilable. For instance,the ape has a great toe in which it uses like a thumb for grasping and it is vastly different from the great toe of mankind. Yet without this feature it would have been impossible for their to have been an evolutionary step due to its inability to be able to survive without this essential function of the great toe and  due to the process of the survival of the fittest it would not have proliferated itself to future generations. In addition to this there has never been any tangible evidence found to substantiate this claim concerning the mutation of a migrating toe.

Another example would be the head placement between a man and primate which are different. Our heads are balanced on top of the spinal column for the sake of walking or running in the upright position and their heads are hinged in front of the spinal column for ease of movement upon all fours.  Again no evidence has ever been found to support this transitional phase and yet in just one evolutionary move this would not allow for the survival of the species.

One more point is that the babies of primates are different from humans as the primates after they are born are able to be somewhat independent as they are able to run and climb onto their mothers back while the human child is completely helpless. This one would really take a leap of faith in believing that this devolutionary process would contribute somehow to its survival but rather the concept of natural selection would lead to the extinction of such inferior earthly accidents.

Also what are the chances for a set of ape parents to produce dizygotic twins (male and female) which could survive as the first non-ape human babies and then reproduce offspring of their own in continuing the reproduction cycle.

Some other things to consider in what has been proposed as a apart of debunking the evolutionary myth is that according to the evolutionists mankind has somehow existed on earth for a million years. This of course would create an over population of the human race by theoretically putting the population at 10 to the 5000th power by 1970 which is a number that this world could not even sustain.

Even if you add in wars, plagues, and famines this would still not be enough to account for lower numbers of humans as even in our modern times of globalization and industrialization we continue to be more destructive in regards to the human race in finding more sophisticated means of dealing a death blow to whole populations with the spread of disease and the continuity of warfare which has led this last century to be one of the bloodiest and epidemic of all times.

Sure we have made giant leaps in technological advances in preserving life but this is countered in limiting life likewise by birth control, abortion, infanticide and euthanasia.

Also if population control has been managed by these mass extinctions over the course of human history then where is the fossil evidence concerning these massive graves of people that have died out.

The reality is that the fossil evidence isn’t there because the mankind hasn’t been a resident on the planet for that long and based on some statistical models the present world population supports more of a biblical model of creation of  thousands of years versus the hypothetical evolutionist model of a million.

Lastly the sign of a master designer tends to emerge  in creating and sustaining the gene pool of man as we depend upon external forces that are beyond our ability to control such as what is expressed in the the Anthropic Principle where it takes exactly the right amount of oxygen, carbon dioxide, sunlight, magnetic field, speed of rotation and revolution of the earth, distance from the moon, distance from the sun, ozone, water, gravity, etc. which have to be in the correct amount at the right times and places  and in exact relationships in order to sustain human life.

I think in the final analysis that the evolutionists would like to find another model to hide behind because of the nakedness of their bare bones of evolutionary  theory which has failed to cover up the frailty of their shame.

 
How to know God

Atheist and Agnostic Resources

English Articles on Atheism and Agnosticism

 


 

Copyright Permission by “The Evolution of a Creationist” by Dr. Jobe Martin

Henry M. Morris, Biblical Cosmology and Modern Science (Nutley, New Jersey: Craig Press, 1970), p.75

Shattering the Myths of Darwinism by Richard Milton, Park Street Press,

© 1992, 1997 Inner Traditions / Bear & Co.