Archive for March, 2011

Kabbalah

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011

Judaism has added a variety of extra biblical materials to their spiritual resume which has led to other authoritative materials outside of the bible such as their rabbinic writings along with the Kabbalah.

Much of this information has been supposedly passed down through generations of oral tradition and has led to the folklore of superstitious religious beliefs. You can see this clearly just from reading the Jewish Book of Why.

Anyway oral tradition is not a credible form of transmission as it often evolutionary as being in a constant state of flux. Its one thing to credit these resources as being culturally ancient but quite another to categorize them as inspirational truth.

Ironically Moses was directed by God concerning his revelation to write these things down when it came to God’s commands, laws, and decrees. Also God instructed the Israelites not to add or subtract from the content of the scripture and yet Judaism has failed this test due to its oral traditions and supplemental texts, Deuteronomy 4:2.

Again in regards to the law of God as found in the torah or pentateuch, Moses finalized the text as writing down all things from beginning to end as a complete text, Deuteronomy 31:24.

Additionally, these oral traditions were not confirmed in the Jewish council of Jamnia in 90 AD as being apart of the canon of scripture. Also if oral traditions were so ancient in going back even to the beginning of time and were firmly embedded in the culture then why were the people oblivious to the biblical commands during the reign of King Josiah when the book of the law had been lost whereby it had to be subsequently reinstated? It was to the astonishment and the remorse of the chief ruler who didn’t have a clue to the content of the book of the Law and therefore if the supreme potentate didn’t have such knowledge then what hope was there for the commoner, 2Kings 22? No wonder God had Moses commit the law to script instead of memory and had he not done so where would we be today? Yet surprisingly even with these biblical texts the word of the Lord is still being revised or improvised and this is what was done through such writings as the Qaballah and the Talmud. How far would this adulterated script have progressed or regressed if we wouldn’t of had any of these sacred documents which argues even more loudly for the necessity of a written revelation as opposed to sanctifying the practice of oral tradition. When God wanted his message passed on to future generations by word of mouth it was only from rehearsing and elaborating on the written revelation not by establishing other traditions or extra sources. No wonder the prophet Isaiah admonished the people of his day and future generations who would take these oral traditions and circulate them in such a way to define a man made religion of what has been formally known as Judaism today.

 

Isaiah 29:13

13 The Lord says:

“These people come near to me with their mouth

and honor me with their lips,

but their hearts are far from me.

Their worship of me

is made up only of rules taught by men.

 

When looking at Cabala it can be compared to neo-Gnosticism as being pagan by incorporating occultic rituals that are more in alignment with the astrology of star gazing and numerology rather than what would be considered scriptural truth. Also it is on par with such things as the DaVinci code, prophecies of Nostradamus and movies like National Treasure which relate to some kind of conspiracy theory.

Yet the Hebrew bible denounces this kind of activity that would be considered in league with the devil. That’s why its not surprising to see those who have a close association with the occult as comfortably participating with such knowledge as being antithetical to the God of the Hebrew bible and in turn is supported by such groups as the Wiccans and is even alluded to in the sorcerer’s handbook. God gave specific instruction to have nothing to do with these occultic practices.

 

Deuteronomy 18:9-13

9 When you enter the land the Lord your God is giving you, do not learn to imitate the detestable ways of the nations there. 10 Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, 11 or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead. 12 Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord, and because of these detestable practices the Lord your God will drive out those nations before you. 13 You must be blameless before the Lord your God.

 

This movement also has ideas that have been borrowed from the Eastern religions with varying concepts that are reminiscent of dualism, panentheism, pantheism, and reincarnation and it also shares in a common view with the mysticism of Sufis along with the practices of Asian culture.

Yet God forbade the Israelites to associate with foreign religions which would be a snare and a stronghold to draw them away from the Lord and would eventually lead to their demise and foreign domination along with a consequential Diaspora.

Regarding the Cabalah many presuppositions are made from manipulating letters and words to form a new meaning or a deeper understanding to the hidden code of the bible and now with super computers the bible can be unlocked like never before in opening up the way to all different possibilities of enlightenment. Even medieval Christianity developed this faulty methodology as finding hidden clues within the plainer view or more literal sense of the text. This can be quite dangerous as it makes the scriptures speculative and subjective in being relativistic versus an objective form of truth. To take historical genre and convert it to allegorical and metaphorical language is heretical and can lead to the destructive properties and consequences of personal interpretation which not only  can violate and conflict with biblical doctrine but it can also lead to bringing harm to its practitioners and others. Intuitively mainstream Judaism rejects the Cabbala today as being authoritative and those who hold to this esoteric script are more towards the outside fringes of Judaism which are mainly the Hassidim.

To show how bizarre and cultish these beliefs are there has been a considerable controversy within those who are associated with the Kabala Centre which has led to such allegations as money grabbing, deceptive marketing, hero worship and the abuse of their members. So much for being a torah focused group which forbids adultery yet has allowed their founder to leave his wife in order to hook up with his secretary in which she believes they had met during a reincarnated state in the Spanish Revolution. This sounds more like New Age rather than a Jewish movement.

Anyway from an external appearance this teaching may seem genuinely concerned with connecting with God as a transcendent being and has become a way of dealing with the difficult language of eschatology and apocalyptic literature as related to supernatural phenomena by trying to make it understandable and accessible. Yet being sincere in your approach doesn’t necessarily ensure you that you are sincerely right.

Also sometimes mankind has a desire to connect with the ultimate reality or Almighty and there is a part of humanity who wants to somehow harness something that is real and tangible even to the point of compromising their common sense to desperately seek out something of significance.  However, what may appear from a first glance to look like wisdom literature is nothing more than foolishness. Kabbalists should consider that God alone reserves the right to maintain the mystery of His being and for a person to think that God has preserved this special knowledge for an elect few is by definition cultish behavior. There is always that tendency to think that you are the few chosen and elect individuals who have access to the key of life and succumbing to this ideology by finding a religious identity of superiority is presumptuous. The bible says in

 

Deuteronomy 29:29

29 The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.

 

Isaiah 55: 8-9

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,

neither are your ways my ways,”

declares the Lord.

9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth,

so are my ways higher than your ways

and my thoughts than your thoughts.

 

If Kabalah was meant as a means to bridge the gap between knowledge and ignorance  then why has this historical movement reserved it participants to be males of 40 years of age or older? Also why do some think this knowledge should only be preserved within the exclusivity of the Jewish culture even if others are desirous of the truth? How about those who didn’t have access to these ideas for millennium but were left in the dark? Also why is the Kabbala so hard to understand if it is to unravel mysteries?

Perhaps there has been a disappointment with the failed appointments of messianic expectations and the oppression felt by the anti-Semitic sentiments of the nations and the scars that have been left from the banishment of the Diaspora but does this somehow demand an altered interpretative method for the biblical text?

Perhaps its an effort to reconnect with something real like the tangible presence of God by which the Jewish people have been deprived of in regards to the temple precincts and the prophetic voice along with the patriarchal figures of its past by somehow reviving the traditions of biblical faith. Maybe there is a void by which somehow something seems deeply wrong and oddly missing from the continuation of the biblical text which has led to a strange and unexplained silence.  Maybe this lack of connectivity and experience has driven them to fill the void of their emptiness by searching for something more relevant in pacifying their identity crisis and therefore where the bible has seemed to leave off in the life of the religious Jew the Qabala has made up the difference by establishing once again a solid connection between the Kabbalist and the storyline of the Bible.

If the scripture has failed to fulfill you and in turn you have a need to peer into the crystal ball of special revelation then maybe it’s because you have missed the exegetical views of key biblical texts that are outside the normative prejudicial views of rabbinic thought.

To rearrange and internalize the text for a more mystical experience may appeal to seducing the mind but does it really diminish the tension of unfulfilled biblical expectations?

One thing I would like to offer, especially for someone who is desperately open to seeking truth by going as far to consider cabalistic teaching, is to meditate on these verses  taken from

 

Jeremiah 31:31-34

31 “The time is coming,” declares the Lord,

“when I will make a new covenant

with the house of Israel

and with the house of Judah.

32 It will not be like the covenant

I made with their forefathers

when I took them by the hand

to lead them out of Egypt,

because they broke my covenant,

though I was a husband to them,”

declares the Lord.

33 “This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel

after that time,” declares the Lord.

“I will put my law in their minds

and write it on their hearts.

I will be their God,

and they will be my people.

34 No longer will a man teach his neighbor,

or a man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’

because they will all know me,

from the least of them to the greatest,”

declares the Lord.

“For I will forgive their wickedness

and will remember their sins no more.”

 

Here it is obvious that the old way of approaching God would be replaced by a new system and therefore how effectual is the Torah to bringing one near to God when it has become obsolete and inferior to a new covenant? Not only that but of the 613 commandments, of which Judaism claims, how many of these cannot be fulfilled in the life of the worshiper today due to the loss of the temple and it’s associated ceremonial rites? Also how is it even possible according to Jewish expectations for the Messiah to return if the law can not be technically upheld?

I know its hard to teach and old dog new tricks but perhaps Jewish tradition is clinging on to something that has been changed. Covenants can and do change such as the  dietary laws from the Adamic covenant in making allowances for the meat eaters of the Noahic covenant. Same God but He changes how He relates to mankind.

After all God is sovereign and to remove the religious centerpiece of the Jewish world and allow the Dome of the Rock to be built on this holy site is an emphatic statement that God is replacing a legalistic form of worship by desiring worshippers who have a heart towards God. This new covenant will be marked  as a time when God would not only give His Spirit to an elect few but would pour out His Spirit on all flesh as prophesied in Joel. A time of exchanging a hardened heart of stone for a heart of flesh as outlined in Ezekiel. A transitory time when the worship of God, which was central to Jerusalem, would no longer be just localized to a city nor just to a few elect people or even a nation but rather there would be an exodus of people from the world community that would rise up to worship the Lord.

 

Isaiah 49:6

6 he says:

“It is too small a thing for you to be my servant

to restore the tribes of Jacob

and bring back those of Israel I have kept.

I will also make you a light for the Gentiles,

that you may bring my salvation to the ends of the earth.”

 

These scriptures are all characteristic of the first century messianic movement which began under the new covenant reign of Yeshua which continues today to impact the world in mass route and even the Jewish community of which there are perhaps over 300,000 strong.

This inauguration took place as Jesus took the role as the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 in being a type a paschal lamb who was identified as the one who takes away the sins of the world as an atonement whereby we have been justified by His salvific work in whom we identify with in Jeremiah 23:6 as being “The Lord our righteousness.”

There is nothing exaggerated about the numerous scriptural claims of a messianic identity concerning Yeshua and many Jews who don’t have a religious prejudice are able to plainly see that some of these prophecies such as Psalms 22 are recognizably speaking about the person of Jesus. Some will even think that these passages were taken straight from the Brit Hadasha not even realizing that these words proceeded from the pages of the Tanakh.

Whether one wants to admit it or not Jesus is the most influential jew from a world wide perspective and to imagine that the world which has largely persecuted jews, including pseudo christians, would follow after a Jewish leader as their King and Lord should be a sign not from the pages of the Zohar but from the plain text of the bible that He is the Messiah.

There have been many messianic hopefuls among Judaism’s elite, such as Schneerson, who will only live on in the contemporary minds and hearts of a few and subsequently will only serve as a reference to the history books. Therefore  he does not even come close to making a universal impact but rather he has only made a small contribution and imprint to the scope of world Jewry which disappointedly came short of fulfilling the role of Messiah.

Also what of Sabbatai Zevi who was a major contributor to Kabalistic teaching and who thought that he was the Messiah but who later submitted to Allah by converting to Islam? What a major setback for those who held to the insightfulness of these encrypted texts and what a disappointment to those who were left with yet another false messiah.

When contemplating Kabbalistic teaching in searching for hidden codes this can be a real avoidance of something that at times is so obvious that there must be a real blindness and stubbornness to overlooking the Messiahship of Yeshua or Jesus. Perhaps the truth of the matter is that He is not the Messiah you wanted and that would be perfectly in line with His rejection as expressed in Isaiah 53. Yet how does this herd mentality of Judaism readily affirm the truthfulness of its position which has historically rejected Him and yet when looking at their track record from the pages of the bible there is  a consistent theme by which corporate Israel has continually turned away from God and His anointed leaders over the course of biblical history?Therefore the idea that the majority rules may work for the democratic vote but it doesn’t affect the theocratic vote of the one true God.

The old covenant which led to the banishment of Israel under the subjection of foreign occupancy along with the destruction of the temple does not mean the defeat of the Jewish faith but rather it is God who is opening up a new and living way.

To try to maintain the Mosaic covenant by a replacement theology of prayer, good deeds, and fasting to compensate for the rituals of the Old Testament covenant is a pacifier and a lie to implement a man made system that “works” and to uphold to any of these extra biblical texts such as the writings of the Rabbis and the Kabbalah is just another golden calf which has robbed the people from a full disclosure to the revelatory wisdom of God. To try to make your own way is no different than the idolatries of Israel’s past who prostituted themselves to a foreign reality of a god kind by developing a spiritual aptitude that is unrelated to the biblical text in making a god after their own image.

If Kabbalah is the real gatekeeper to the storehouse of God’s knowledge then why did it take so long to establish after the canon of scripture? To give Qabalah an earlier date such as the second century or before is truly gratuitous and speculative at best and most don’t even really know when it all began but many have assigned it to the medieval time period in being developed as a reactionary and revolutionary response versus a revelation.

As a biblical injunction false seers and prophets were condemned as flirting with God’s word and this is no different than the falsehood and error that is practiced among these Kabalistic visionaries.

So to force and coerce the scriptures like a magician is only an illusion to truth and in the end it will only prove to be trickery and deception.

Additionally, manipulating God’s name as a hocus pocus is what many occultic cultures do when they pronounce blessings or curses in thinking that somehow they are invoking the supreme power by their words. It is believed among some of these cultures that by knowing someones name that you obtain a type of mastery or control by which to influence the person or situation.

Therefore can we really order the universe by finding the right key to knowledge and can a person master their own destination strictly through the intellectualism of a book?

Also to categorize these books as being in alignment with science is plain dishonesty as this movement is associated with merely hunches, speculations, superstitions, and intuitions about concepts of metaphysical entities or properties  which are beyond the boundaries of phenomenal science which would put this in league more with science fiction than the scientific method.  This can be seen through its beliefs on the  pronouncements of curses, the practice of mystical rites and the use of magical words, along with the arrangement of ones bed and the donning of the red string, etc., etc.

Additionally, biblical faith and macro-evolution are at odds and to say that evolution, which may be true to Kabbalistic teaching, is compatible with the scriptures is really a denial to the plain truth of the Torah and is characteristic with unbelief as submitting to the spirit of this age. By expressing faith in the philosophy and theory of macro-evolution is not only bad religion but it’s also bad science as well.

Lastly, if the precise wording of the Torah is tantamount to the credibility of this interpretive science then what about the scriptural nuances that are prevalent in the copies of the Hebrew texts by which we have no original autographs? This can be readily seen when comparing the Dead Sea Scrolls with the Masoretic Text.  Even though the copyist did a tremendous job in preserving the text there are still minor variations which can not be reconciled to a system which utterly depends on the complete accuracy of every letter, word, and accent.

In closing, by reflecting on Yeshua it might be a deviation from the traditional way of Jewish thinking but I can’t imagine why such a Jewish figure who had such a positive and universal influence on society not be given serious consideration concerning His messianic credentials.

Is it possible that by looking through the lens of the Kaballah that you have been blind sighted by overlooking what God has openly revealed through the “Word of God” in speaking about the person and work of Yeshua?

If you are vulnerable and desperate enough to reach out to this erroneous mystery novel then why is searching the New Testament necessarily forbidden. Perhaps you should look again and see if there is anything which can be learned from this primary Jewish resource.

Also I know that I have said some very challenging things and that my language has been very pointed and I apologize if I have offended you by overstating my position. Its just that I would like to offer a challenge to you in order that you might benefit in finding the spiritual intimacy that you are really longing for.

So in closing all I would ask is that you would prayerfully reflect and ask God to reveal to you the truth of the matter concerning Jesus and in so doing by connecting with God in a real and personal relationship.

 

 

How to have a relationship with God

How to know God

 

Other Links

English

Jewish Resources of Jesus

 

 

“Reprinted by permission.  “(Nelson’s Illustrated Guide to Religions), James A. Beverley, 2009,Thomas Nelson Inc. Nashville, Tennessee.  All rights reserved.”

“Should a Christian be a Mason”, E.M. Storms, 1999, pg.20, Impact Christian Books, 332 Leffingwell Ave., Kirkwood, Missouri 63122.

Dieu est un

Sunday, March 6th, 2011

Lors d’une tentative de discuter ou de définir la notion de Dieu nous nous rendons compte qu’Il est un être complexe qui échappe à la capacité de l’esprit naturel de bien comprendre Sa personne. Dieu nous connaît intimement, que ce soit le nombre de cheveux sur la tête ou les hautes exigences de nos pensées . Il sait quand nous nous sommes couchés et quand nous nous levons. Il n’y a pas lieu que l’on peut s’échapper ou se cacher de sa présence parce qu’il est Dieu.

Nous sommes juste l’argile et Il est le potier qui nous a façonné et pourtant nous pouvons faire des hypothèses audacieuses que Dieu peut être observé en Le plaçant sous l’objectif de notre microscope théologique? Nous ne comprenons même pas bien la complexité de Sa création et encore moins celui qui l’a créé. Ne semble t’il  pas un peu arrogant ou obstiné de dire qu’une personne peut connaître Dieu dans toute la mesure de la même façon qu’ Il les connaît?

Comment pouvons-nous limiter Dieu à une définition complète, lorsque les théologiens sont souvent laissés pour saisir les conditions et méthodes d’interprétation afin d’aider à faire Dieu plus connaissable? Aucun homme n’a jamais vu Dieu et ce que Dieu donna à Moïse n’était qu’un avant-goût de son arrière-plan.

La Bible décrit ensuite notre connaissance limitée du créateur en affirmant que Ses pensées ne sont pas nos pensées, ni Ses voies nos voies.

Même la Bible qui contient Sa révélation ne contient pas la pleine révélation de Son être, comme si nous pouvions le comprendre de toute façon, même si cela nous était décrit. Nous avons une idée de ce que à la lecture de la littérature apocalyptique qui nous laisse avec un sentiment de crainte et de stupeur indescriptible.

Nous tenons à limiter Dieu de la boîte d’un temple terrestre. Pourtant, même les cieux ne peuvent le contenir. Nous sommes des êtres finis pourtant Il est infini dans Sa personne et Son caractère. Nous apprenons à connaître, tandis qu’Il est omniscient ou sait tout.

Quelle comprehension nous pouvons obtenir de Dieu vient de la fragilité du langage et d’expression humaine. Quelle que soit l’opinion on peut voir de Dieu est comparé à l’obscurité de regarder à travers une lentille opaque.

Simplement ce que nous savons de Dieu est ce qu’Il a décidé de faire connaître. Nous  pouvons connaître Dieu, mais seulement sous l’inspiration qu’Il choisit de se faire connaître ou divulgué. Il est le modérateur et donc en tentant de prendre le contrôle de la modération, nous nous trouvons comme un spéculateur qui est une position dangereuse de la croyance.

Même avec le sens plus complet de la capacité de l’homme qui résulte du processus d’alliance suivante de la régénération, nous nous retrouvons avec une vue diminuée dans le domaine de notre expérience humaine. Bien que nous soyons transformé par le renouvellement de nos esprits et cœurs en étant né de nouveau nous sommes encore limité dans nos connaissances qui aspire à une illumination future qui ne vient que lorsque nous nous écartons des limites de ce monde pour le prochain.

On voit même une limitation à ceux qui ont eu le privilège divin de connaître Dieu à travers le don de prophétie de prononcer Ses mots et pourtant ils voulaient en savoir plus pleinement le mystère duquel ils ont parlé et même les anges, à qui nous sont inférieurs trop et a fait un peu inférieur, se retrouvent sans éclairage complet concernant les questions dont ils désirent plonger leurs regards dans la même manière.

Nous voyons que les gens ont toujours lutté avec des idées comme liés à l’existence de Dieu et ces concepts sont parfois si élevés que les écoles de théologiens ont combattu en martelant une image de Dieu qui lui donne un visage. Nous utilisons des termes tels que anthropomorphe, théophanie, incarnation, shekinah, et triunité pour aider à expliquer des images conceptuelles de Dieu.

Pourtant, que nous essayons de mettre Dieu à notre niveau en forçant une définition existentielle dans les limites de notre compréhension ou y at-il un point que nous devons accepter la réalité de l’existence de Dieu sans regarder vers les applications mystiques concernant l’obscurité de Sa personne.

Une grande partie de nos expériences humaines sont reléguées par la voie de la perception humaine que ce soit les instincts de base de nos cinq sens étendant à des comportements plus complexes comme de nos valeurs sociales et culturelles.

Nous voyons ces limites, même lorsqu’il s’agit de comprendre l’action humaine que la comparaison de l’homme contemporain à une culture biblique. Prenez par exemple pour quelqu’un qui peut connaître l’hébreu moderne mais manque de compétences de comprendre l’hébreu biblique avec l’ensemble de ses significations anciennes et les nuances. Même si une personne peut obtenir un sentiment de maîtrise sur ces concepts bibliques, ils sont toujours laisses avec une mentalité moderne.

Je vois aussi une distinction entre les cultures que j’ai expérimenté de dialoguer avec mes amis musulmans au sujet de la filiation du Messie qui leur désigne la consommation de l’acte physique de l’expérience sexuelle. Le concept biblique de la filiation n’est pas limitée à l’acte procréateur de la procréation, mais plutôt il étend son application à être analogue à une expression relationnelle d’endurance basé sur une relation intime et personnelle indépendante de tout une simple composante physique.

Si nous, en tant qu’humains avons des difficultés à se rapporter à chaque autre basé sur la sphère limitée de temps et l’espace alors combien plus nous sommes retiré de la compréhension de “Celui” à qui a créé le temps et l’espace.

Peut-être qu’il suffit de savoir que Dieu existe et qu’Il est le rémunérateur de ceux qui Le cherchent. Pourtant, je me rends compte qu’il s’agit d’une vue tres simplifiée et ne suffit donc pas à aborder cette grande difficulté et le dilemme dans la compréhension de la nature de l’existence de Dieu.

Le concept de Dieu exige plus qu’une simple révélation générale par ailleurs notre culte pourrait être mal dirige ou mal appliqué. Il exige une révélation spéciale, mais seulement dans la mesure où Dieu révèle par rapport à l’invention humaine ou révélation qui peut être déformée par le processus de l’imagination et la spéculation. En d’autres termes il n’y a point de Dieu qui établit une borne à nos convictions doctrinales et notre problème est que nous essayons de le déplacer en étendant ses limites. Je crois que nous voyons cela à travers les écrits de la littérature rabbinique supplémentaires ainsi que d’autres cultes ou religions qui ressentent le besoin d’augmenter leur connaissance résultant dans une vue Gnostique comme ayant une connaissance particulière.

Je ne crois pas que notre incapacité à bien saisir et comprendre l’existence de Dieu nous limite dans notre relation avec Lui. Il est toujours notre Dieu si nous n’avons pas les détails intimes de notre “Abba” qui est infini et immortel. Même si je ne comprends parfaitement l’être de Dieu est ce que cela changerait alors quelque chose? Est-il correct de dire que certaines choses devaient rester un mystère sans le sondage intellectuellement suicidaire? Nous, les humains avons ce sens inné de repousser les limites de nos expériences existentielles et une fois de plus nous nous trouvons à retourner à la scène du jardin de devenir sage comme Dieu en prenant le proverbial fruit défendu de la connaissance qui, lorsqu’il est consommé nous laisse plus bête que sale.

Dieu est plus préoccupé en nous bien à son égard par rapport à faire de lui une image obtenue dans nos esprits.

Nous avons seulement une caricature de Dieu à travers le portrait biblique rien n’est ajouté ou enlevé ce serait présomptueux au mieux et au pire blasphème. Il devrait suffire pour nous de dire que la personne de Dieu est enveloppée d’une part de mystère.

Je suis désolé d’avoir  pris autant de temps dans mon introduction, mais j’ai pensé qu’il serait utile à la transition vers notre prochaine étape de la discussion qui est l’existence trinitaire de Dieu.

Pour commencer, je tiens à dire qu’en tant que Chrétien, je suis d’accord que Dieu est un et cela est confirmé par les écrits du Nouveau Testament ainsi que les croyances Chrétiennes.

J’affirme la confession du Shema que l’on trouve dans Deutéronome 6:4 qui établit Dieu comme étant un.

Lorsque l’on considère l’unité de Dieu, nous pensons souvent dans des termes aussi liés à une valeur numérique ou une unité absolue. Le mot utilisé dans le Shema est “echad” qui signifie simplement un seul et ce mot peut aussi être utilisé pour désigner une unité composée contrairement au mot «yachid” qui est utilisé en référence à une unité absolue. Nulle part dans l’Écriture il y a une référence à Dieu d’être «yachid”.

Le mot «echad»est utilisé dans Genèse 2:24 pour désigner le mari et  femme étant joints ensemble comme une (echad) chair, 2 Samuel 7:23 appelle Israël comme étant une (echad) nation. Ce qui est compris, c’est que l’utilisation du mot n’était pas destiné à avoir une vue philosophique sur la nature essentielle de Dieu, mais plutôt une déclaration qu’Il est Dieu seul. Cela est encore soutenu par la New Jewish Publication Society Version qui traduit le Shema de cette manière et cela est également soutenu par les commentateurs médiévaux Abraham Ibn Ezra et Rashbam. En d’autres termes, nous trouvons l’exclusivité en Dieu seul dans lequel Israël ne devait  pas adorer d’autres dieux Esaïe 45: 5 “Je suis le Seigneur et il n’y a pas d’autre; en dehors de moi il n’ya pas de Dieu.”

Le nom hébreu de Dieu “Elohim” est un nom masculin pluriel qui spécifie la puissance de Dieu. Cela ne doit pas  être confondu dans la définition de l’essence même de l’existence de Dieu mais il semble faire référence à la pluralité majestueuse de l’ être de Dieu qui décrirait une personne de grande importance et la signification basée sur l’étude de la langue et le culture Sémitique ancienne .

Il ya aussi les textes bibliques dans lesquels Dieu parle en disant: «Faisons l’homme à notre image et à sa ressemblance», «laissons descendre et confondre les langues”, “l’homme est devenu comme l’un d’entre nous qui connaissent le bien et le mal.” L’utilisation pluraliste de ces noms est probablement juste une autre expression de la pensée hébraïque, car ces noms sont suivis avec la forme du verbe singulier. La seule plausibilité que je vois à tout ce scénario concernant la nature de Dieu comme étant plus qu’une simple forme majestueuse du pluriel, c’est que le reste de la Bible, à l’exception  d’autres références, ne supporte pas ce type de verbiage et pourtant le nom de Dieu est mentionné dans le Tanakh volumineusement.

Lorsqu’on se réfère à la tri-unité de Dieu comme étant l’un, c’est avec un sens complet d’unité tout en conservant une personnalité individuelle. Ce terme est loin d’être clairement représenté dans un mode coupé net ou d’une manière courte et définissable selon le texte biblique. En fait, c’ est tout à fait un mystère tout comme certains des autres références juives à la vue de Dieu, comme la notion mystique de la «Dix Seferot», «Shekinah», et le concept des  Targums Araméens qui parlent de la divine “Memra” ou parole. Si ce n’est pas suffisant pour vous inciter à s’interroger sur la magnificence de Dieu étant alors simplement réfléchir sur son omniprésence dans l’qu’Il remplit l’univers entier à la fois.

Le mot conceptuelle liée à une «Trinité»ou «Triunité” était juste un moyen pour aider à définir Dieu tout comme ces autres termes ont essayé de faire. Nous devons nous rappeler que ce sont les Juifs du premier siècle qui a écrit la majorité des passages du Nouveau Testament et que leur position et de la confession sur un concept Dieu a été fondée sur une vision monothéiste de Dieu. Le terme «Trinité» n’a pas été inventé jusqu’à environ 150 après JC quand il a été utilisé par Tertullien principalement comme un réactionnaire ou comme une déclaration apologétique de la foi.

J’ai écrit sur un blog précédent sur la “divinité du Messie», dans lequel le Nouveau Testament n’a pas de problème de monter un dossier pour encore il s’agit d’une notion vague dans la Tanakh sauf pour le sens unique et exalté du roi Messie qui apporterait de suite une restauration par son règne glorieux.

Une des images les plus grandioses de ce chiffre est donné dans le Messie, le prophète Daniel 7:13-14 où l’on compare vers le fils de l’homme arrive avec les nuées du ciel et des approches de l’Ancien des Jours. Ce qui est intéressant, c’est que cette figure Messianique a  donné le culte de tous les peuples de toute langue avec toutes les nations ralliant à la bannière de son règlement et règne. Nous le voyons déjà dans le Messie Yeshoua ou Jésus, qui a réconcilié avec Dieu les Juifs et Gentils dans l’accomplissement de cette vision prophétique.

Aucune autre figure messianique dans toute l’histoire humaine a eu une telle influence et l’impact que Jésus n’est pas non plus leur toute concurrence de tout autre candidat redoutable pour le titre de Messie à part Yeshoua.

Le culte est seulement à donner à Dieu et donc par l’association de culte et son état d’exaltation que venant sur les nuées du ciel ce n’est pas juste un autre être angélique.

Ésaïe 9:6-7 qui est un autre passage messianique concerne celui qui devait naitre comme un fils et avoir des noms élevés comme «Père éternel»et «Dieu puissant”. Cette description va au-delà du simple fait de décrire un homme ordinaire.

Vous pouvez penser que c’est peut-être plausible, mais vous êtes encore laissé étonné sur la divinité du Saint-Esprit ou l’Esprit de Dieu qui à plusieurs reprises est évoquée comme étant synonyme de Dieu? Pourquoi la Bible nécessite une définition de Dieu comme étant l’Esprit et cette expression est juste un autre terme de la personnification de Dieu lui-même?

Nous voyons que dans la Genèse que l’Esprit de Dieu planait sur les eaux. Dans les Psaumes 104:30 il parle de Dieu envoyant son Esprit à faire naître une rénovation sur la terre dans l’établissement de la création de Son ordre comme nous le voyons dans le récit de la Genèse.

Nous voyons aussi mystérieusement comment l’Esprit de Dieu est envoyé et la façon dont Sa gloire a été déposée auprès des hommes d’une façon dynamique de la créativité. Ces hommes étaient des artisans, des prophètes, des rois et des prêtres qui tout au long de l’histoire d’Israël ont montré le pouvoir de Dieu basée sur la facilitation de l’Esprit. Le prophète Joël déclare dans 2:28 que l’Esprit ne sera plus envoyé ou versé que sur un peuple élu, mais plutôt un déluge aurait lieu sur toute chair.

Quand vous pensez à la mécanique d’un tel impartation ou d’un acte divin cela va au-delà de la simple compréhension humaine. Comment peut Dieu répandre son être divin sur les hommes? C’est un mystère en soi et encore moins d’essayer de comprendre la nature de l’existence de Dieu.

En conclusion cela ne répond pas à toutes les questions liées à l’être de Dieu ni n’explique  toutes les facettes de Sa merveilleuse et mystérieuse personne, et pourtant même si la compréhension des Chrétiens et des Juifs diffèrent dans leur application pragmatique de l’existence de Dieu, il reste encore une croyance commune dans le seul vrai Dieu des Ecritures comme décrit dans le Tanakh.

Peu importe comment nous essayons d’assimiler avec une précision mathématique la notion calculée de Son être, nous nous retrouvons avec une incapacité infinie de formuler une doctrine conceptuelle suffisamment de Lui limite à la sphère de notre expérience terrestre.

Enfin Dieu est mystérieusement exprimé à travers ses réalités complexes de l’être par les personnes qui portent des titres comme «L’Ancien des Jours», «Le fils de l’homme», et «l’Esprit.”

 

 

Comment avoir une relation avec Dieu

 

autres liens

Ressources Juives de Jésus

Juif question de Jesus

G-d is one

 

 

* Of special note regarding the title and term ‘Son of God’ , it is used in its most unique and supreme sense as a reference to the divinity of Jesus as the Christ in Mathew 28:16-20, John 5:16-27, and Hebrews 1. La divinité du Messie

Zoroastrianism Resources

Sunday, March 6th, 2011

1. Audio Resources

Audio New Testament

 

2. Written Bible

Download Complete New Testament

 

3. Watch the “Jesus Film”

Jesus Film, view now

 

4. Gods Plan of Salvation “The Four Spiritual Laws”

knowgod.com/mr/fourlaws/0?utm_source=4laws&utm_medium=website&utm_campaign=4laws-visit&utm_content=marathi&cid=dp-website-4laws-gds-qq-4lawsref-mr-4267196862549

Sai Baba Resources

Sunday, March 6th, 2011

Four Spiritual Laws

 

Jesus Film

 

New Testament

 

Audio Bible

Cao Dai Resources

Sunday, March 6th, 2011

1. Audio Resources

 

 

2. Written Bible

 

 

3. Watch the “Jesus Film”

 

 

4. Gods Plan of Salvation “The Four Spiritual Laws”

Bahai Faith Resources

Sunday, March 6th, 2011

1. Audio Resources

Audio New Testament

 

2. Written Bible

Download Complete New Testament

 

3. Watch the “Jesus Film”

Jesus Film, view now

 

4. Gods Plan of Salvation “The Four Spiritual Laws”

Four Spiritual Laws

Zoroastrianism

Saturday, March 5th, 2011

When first researching this religion I noticed that there were many admirable qualities to this basic belief system which advocates the concepts of good thinking, speaking the truth, and good actions. However, this structure of belief is not completely unique to other religious views that have a positive work related program for salvation.

Additionally, these attributes are honorable but in reality are they attainable and how can one ultimately know or measure their spiritual progress? After all even this movement has had its share of moral conflicts due to the violation of its own standards by the means of (1)two holy wars and therefore if this religion is marred by its past violence then how can it reassure its adherents the certainty of paradise?

Also one position which I see no basis for is their certain views concerning the afterlife.  I have already blogged about life after death and there are people who have been scientifically studied after they temporarily underwent clinical death by which they had a Near Death Experience and in some of these testimonies people were immediately ushered into heaven without foregoing a temporarily hellish realm as taught in Zoroastrianism. jesusandjews.com/wordpress/2009/10/29/is-hell-real/

These heaven and hell experiences are consistent with the witness of the scripture which depicts Jesus as having the keys of death and hell by which He has secured a victory through His substitutionary death which left the Apostle Paul to exclaim ‘O death where is your sting’. Paul saw death as a welcoming invitation to the departure of this life and a comfort rather than the anticipation of suffering, Philippians 1:21-24.

The bible also indicates for those who are in Christ that they would not be subjected to fear because God’s perfect love casts out all fear because fear has to do with judgment. That is why we can have confidence in our relationship with the Lord because we have been saved from God’s wrath through the meritorious deeds of a perfect Christ in which He has overcome the power of evil not only in our personal lives through the regeneration of new birth but also in the life to come and that is the essence of the gospel message.

The good news of Jesus Christ deals with the elements of mercy and grace which remarkably are requirements to the Zoroastrian code of conduct yet paradoxically this ideal has only a limited benefit in its association with the standard of supreme goodness as represented in the nature of Ahura Mazda.

So for the idea of forgiveness as being primarily an ethical pearl of humanity is a slanderous accusation towards the God who created us with this obligatory and moral requirement. Therefore by not equating forgiveness with the Creator is to succumb to its evil counterpart of unforgiveness and therefore it begs the question of how can this not apply to the supreme standard of goodness namely God. After all what kind of hope is there when faced with the dilemma between trusting in a God who essentially is waiting to get you back for your misdeeds in spite of your best efforts?

Anyway this may just seem like a philosophical argument but upon closer observation it really gets at the heart of the matter in that the benefactors of grace, mercy, and forgiveness speaks not only to the human constituents of love but rather it bears the mark of the long suffering of God towards a sinful humanity and this is what we see in plain view of the person and work of Christ who relieves the tension between the forces of both justice and love by fulfilling them both through His sacrificial death on the human altar of the cross whereby making peace with God on our behalf..

Another inconsistency to this religion is their theological position(s) concerning the nature of Ohrmazd which is diametrically opposed based on its varied positions.

I can accept a certain degree of transcendence with God in the mystery of His person yet there appears to be a conflict in the ontological categories of His being in that Zoroastrianism claims a monotheistic faith which at best appears to be henotheistic with overtones of polytheism and pantheism. There seems to be a real confusion and conflict here that is irreconcilable due to its contradictory nature of being. So if they can not establish a firm footing in which to ascend in their understanding of God’s nature then how can they ensure that they are following the true path of God by keeping the tenants of their other doctrinal beliefs?

This diversity of thinking may be in part due to the influence of variant eastern religions on this  religious sect. Even though Zoroaster, like so many of the other religious leaders, supposedly had received a vision of enlightenment in defining what is true religion, it has still borrowed in part from other religious orders associated with its Indo-Iranian background.

Likewise, there are notable similarities between Zoroastrianism and Judeo Christian beliefs and some have offered the idea that Zoroastrianism had influenced these two world views and yet it may be on the contraire since many of the present day writings of Zoroastrianism did not largely exist until long after the advent of Christianity and much of what can be known about Zoroastrianism like the Avesta was either lost or fragmentary which leaves a person guessing as to what was the original content to begin with.

Also it may leave us to wonder if Zarathustra himself could even recognize what is to be attributed to him among their sacred writings of today.

You know it is inconceivable or unfathomable how that a supreme revelation of significance could be lost due to the mismanagement of a sovereign creator who failed to relay or preserve these texts for the benefit of future generations of Zoroastrians. Not only this but this expression of faith has been modified down through the years in order to contemporize its expression to the modern day worshipper and yet how can that be true to the original intent of this religion?

Also by what authority does this modernist or revisionist view have towards abolishing the purest expressions of the faith which would be considered definably orthodox to its former practitioners who participated in such rites as animal sacrifice?

Anyway another controversial practice is that the worshippers of this faith consume the intoxicating (2)drink of  Haoma which is a drug altering substance which is synonymous with occultic practices by achieving a hyped or altered state which one can open oneself up to the realm of the demonic. Even among the members of the priesthood who are referred to as (3)Magi have a direct link to our  modern word for magic which is suggestive to the occultic influence or background to this movement.

Also I believe another conflicting practice among Zoroastrianism is that many of them reject the proselytizing of individuals as converts which would include the prohibition of intermarriage and yet this is perhaps what has led to the demise and the dwindling numbers of this movement which is systematically becoming extinct and yet how can the true knowledge of God be passed down to future generations and  encouraged to grow if eventually  it is diminished or lost only to be preserved by the annals of history?

Well anyway in closing I hope this post  is not just seen as a bashing on what is considered  a nice religion but rather I hope it is a challenge to what devotees see as being  the order of supreme truth. Also for those whose only relationship to this movement is just a nominal devotion to a cultural rite of passage my encouragement to you is to have  the courage to think more critically about spiritual matters in preparing yourself to be able to break free from a system of falsehood.

Lastly, on a personal note for those who are still open in your searching, have you fulfilled the longing in your soul to be connected to God but only sense that you’re yearning has left you to embrace the emptiness of a dead religion?

Perhaps you are wearied by the prospects and the outcome of this religious order and yet Jesus said in Matthew 11:28-30 28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.”

The scripture also reads in I John 1:9 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.

This cleansing is completely efficacious apart from the superficiality of any type of ritualistic or hygienic ceremonial washings. Realistically, cleanliness is not next to godliness but rather Jesus said clean the inside of the cup which refers to the purify of heart rather than focusing on the superficiality of the removal of human filth. This can only happen as He gives you a new nature resulting in a transformed heart and a renewed mind.

 

How to know God

Zoroastrianism Resources

 

 

 

Excerpts taken “From Handbook of World Religions, published by Barbour Publishing, Inc. Used by permission”

AMG’s World Religions and Cults, AMG Publishers, Chattanooga, Tennessee

All marked references are attributed to:

© 2009 Josh McDowell Ministry. All rights reserved. No part of these Materials may be changed in any way or reproduced in any form without written permission from Josh McDowell Ministry, 660 International Parkway, Richardson, TX 75081. www.josh.org. +1 972 907 1000. Used by Permission.