There has been no evidence of macro evolution where we have creatures evolving into other creatures.<\/p>\n
Even Darwin in his book on the origin of species by means of natural selection affirms this by stating that there was no proof that one species has changed\u00a0 into another nor could he affirm that if these changes did take place that it would even be beneficial which according to him was the groundwork for his own theory.<\/p>\n
This could not even be verified by leading evolutionary thinkers who had come from various scientific backgrounds in order to discuss the mechanism of speciation in Rome of 1981.<\/p>\n
Dr. Ernst Mayr, professor emeritus of Harvard, who attended this convention explained that they had no idea what happens genetically during speciation and concluded by saying that this was a damning statement but nevertheless it\u2019s the truth.<\/p>\n
Some people have a creative gift to produce colorful animation through the imaginative arts of their faith which depicts how things may have randomly come together from our past. There are also the prophets of\u00a0 paleontology who are specialized in studying the remains of fossilized bones and are characterized by the scientific community as the gurus of piecing together the past accidents of chance.<\/p>\n
When these charismatic individuals present their Hollywood production to their\u00a0 world wide congregations then there evolves just another religious order which has joined\u00a0 together the theoretical philosopher\u00a0 and the faith artist on the basis of their supposed truth and then preached from the pulpit of the textbook as an exact or a precise science. Yet at the heart of this religious movement of naturalistic philosophy is an atheistic agenda which tries to convert unsuspecting souls into trusting them with their PhD of expertise and at best what they have to offer their laity is a doctrine of speculation but in reality they are attempting to brainwash others into their cult of academic dishonesty.<\/p>\n
To take the skeletal remains of an extinct animal and piece them together is one thing but to project a whole line of thought on how they fit in the picture of one species replacing another is preposterous. What science can prove is that animals have achieved slight variations within species and that through entropy that older forms of life died and became extinct. What they can\u2019t prove is that newer forms of life evolved from the means of natural selection by achieving some form of superior being as a different or improved species.<\/p>\n
Also just because there are similarities between species doesn\u2019t necessitate evolution either but all it ascertains is the common element that animals are designed for a common atmosphere on earth with a common food chain of certain basic chemicals.<\/p>\n
This theory of evolution has certain large gaps in the synapses of its thoughts which has led a society into a mindless revolution of evolution in which man has attempted to replace God with science fiction.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
How to know God<\/a><\/p>\n